Translate this page into:
A stratified investigation of a single injection of extended-release corticosteroid for symptomatic relief in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
*Corresponding author: Brian C. Werner, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States. bcw4x@uvahealth.org
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Braig ZV, Holte AJ, Ignozzi AJ, Gwathmey FW, Brockmeier SF, Werner BC. A stratified investigation of a single injection of extended-release corticosteroid for symptomatic relief in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. doi: 10.25259/JMSR_89_2026
Abstract
Objectives:
Failure of a corticosteroid injection and therapy to provide relief for shoulder adhesive capsulitis results in increasing healthcare costs and patient morbidity from repeat injections and possible surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an extended-release corticosteroid injection in shoulder adhesive capsulitis.
Methods:
This was a phase 2, prospective, non-blinded single-arm study of patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder who received a single, image-guided extended-release corticosteroid injection. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) was measured up to 12 months after injection. Secondary endpoints included American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) score, range of motion (ROM), and need for re-injection.
Results:
Thirty-nine patients with a mean age of 55 ± 9 years were included; 32 (82%) experienced adequate symptom resolution after a single injection. Mean VAS improved from 5 to 1.4 (p < 0.01), and mean ASES score improved from 43 to 80 (p < 0.01) by 6-week post-injection, with sustained improvement through 1-year follow-up. Patients demonstrated improvements in mean passive forward elevation (117–173°; p < 0.01), abduction (98– 162°; p < 0.01), and external rotation with the arm adducted (32–59°; p < 0.01).
Conclusion:
A single intra-articular injection of extended-release corticosteroid was associated with sustained improvements in pain relief, patient-reported outcomes, and ROM in patients with idiopathic shoulder adhesive capsulitis.
Keywords
Adhesive capsulitis
Injections
Shoulder injuries
Triamcinolone acetonide
Visual analog scale
INTRODUCTION
The clinical examination of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis is a progressive restriction of passive glenohumeral motion, driven by a cascade of capsular inflammation and subsequent fibrotic contracture.[1] It occurs in approximately 2–5% of the population. While the true etiology of the condition remains unknown, it has been proposed that synovitis triggers a fibrotic cascade.[2] Systemic metabolic factors, most notably diabetes mellitus and thyroid disorders, are associated with an increased prevalence of frozen shoulder.[1,2]
Non-operative protocols prioritize physical therapy and home-based stretching.[1] Oral corticosteroids, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, hydrodilatation, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications are often used as adjuncts to therapy. Arthroscopy with lysis of adhesions and/or manipulation under anesthesia may be needed for patients who fail standard steroid injections.[1,2]
Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids for frozen shoulder is superior to treatment with oral cortisone[3,4] and at least equivalent to isolated manipulation under anesthesia.[5] Injections have been shown to decrease pain and result in earlier return of passive range of motion (ROM).[6-12] Lower doses of steroid injections have demonstrated similar efficacy as a higher dose treatment.[9,12] Image-guided injections have also demonstrated better outcomes compared to landmark-guided injections for shoulder pain.[13]
If an injection does not provide adequate duration of relief, potential next-step treatment options include repeat intraarticular injection or surgical intervention. Either option incurs further healthcare costs and potential morbidity to the patient. It could be of great value to achieve prolonged efficacy with extended-release intra-articular steroid injection for adhesive capsulitis. Previous studies on extended-release corticosteroid injections have shown promise for treating knee osteoarthritis (OA).[14-18] Long-acting steroids, which function by slow release from a biodegradable microsphere, may produce a longer duration of efficacy and avoid the need for costly repeat injections or surgical intervention. An additional potential benefit is less elevation of peripheral blood glucose in diabetics, a known complication of traditional steroid injections that has been demonstrated to be mitigated using a sustained-release formulation.[19]
This study examined the effect of an extended-release corticosteroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. The primary objective of this study was to assess patient-reported pain scores through 1-year follow-up following a single, image-guided injection in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Secondary goals of the study were to assess patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and passive ROM through 1-year follow-up. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Based on prior literature regarding steroid injections for this condition, we hypothesized that there would be a significant reduction in pain at all-time points following the injection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a phase 2, stratified, prospective, non-blinded single-arm study of patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis who received a single, image-guided intra-articular extended-release corticosteroid injection. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All patients provided written informed consent for the prospective study.
Participants
Patients aged 18–80 years old with a diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder were enrolled. All patients were required to have symptoms present for <6 months. We excluded patients with possible confounding orthopedic diagnoses (e.g., glenohumeral OA), active workers’ compensation claims, or ongoing psychiatric treatment that might influence subjective pain reporting. In addition, patients with uncontrolled diabetes defined by severe peripheral neuropathy, diabetic ketoacidosis, ophthalmologic, or renal manifestations were excluded from the study.
Study design
The study population was obtained from patients who presented to the primary authors’ institution. Patients were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, health history, and physical examination. A diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis was made based on history, physical examination, and imaging as indicated. Radiographs were obtained in all patients to rule out glenohumeral arthritis. Advanced imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging, was not obtained in all patients and was only used selectively to rule out other possible pathologies. Once patients were enrolled, baseline measurements of pain, PROs, and ROM measured with a goniometer were recorded. Under ultrasound guidance, a trained radiologist administered a single 32 mg (5 mL) intra-articular dose of a microsphere-based triamcinolone acetonide formulation (Zilretta®; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA) into the glenohumeral joint. This was performed using a posterior approach with a 21-gauge, 3.5-inch spinal needle, with visualization of capsular penetration to confirm glenohumeral intra-articular placement. Patients were enrolled in physical therapy and additionally started on an exercise program at home. This consisted of therapists maximizing passive ROM, patient engagement in active ROM, and rotator cuff strengthening exercises. Clinical follow-up was performed in person at 6-week and 3-month post-injection. At these visits, visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores, PRO measures (PROMs), ROM (using a goniometer), and adverse events were recorded. Visits at 6-month and 12-month post-injection were performed either in person or through video follow- up visit. VAS pain score, PROMs, determination of whether additional injection or intervention was required, and adverse events were recorded. Adequate symptom resolution was defined as 1 year if the patient had symptom improvement without the need for repeat injection or surgical intervention.
Assessments
The primary outcome measure was VAS (0–10) measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after injection. Secondary endpoints included American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Score, triplanar ROM, and need for re-injection.
Statistical analysis
Pain scores, PROs, and physical examination variables were compared using a 1 × 4 repeated measures analysis of variance. Normality assumptions were tested and not violated. To assess the duration of treatment efficacy, we used Dunnett’s post hoc analysis to compare each follow-up interval (6 weeks through 12 months) with the pre-injection baseline. Planned comparisons between diabetic and non-diabetic patients were performed using Student’s t-tests at each time point. We defined statistical significance at α ≤ 0.05. We calculated Cohen’s d effect sizes alongside standard descriptive statistics for all ROM and PRO measurements, with associated 95% confidence intervals, to evaluate changes over time
RESULTS
A total of 39 patients were enrolled in the study. The cohort had a mean age of 55 ± 9 years and a mean body mass index of 29 ± 6 kg/m2. Only one patient had prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery: an arthroscopic debridement performed more than 20 years before the study period. Most patients were female (72%) and white (85%), with 38% of patients diagnosed with diabetes [Table 1]. Thirty-two (82%) patients in the study cohort achieved adequate symptom resolution after extended-release corticosteroid injection. Five (13%) patients underwent subsequent injections for recurrent adhesive capsulitis symptoms during the study period, and two (5%) patients underwent surgery on the study shoulder. One patient underwent an arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with manipulation under anesthesia 5 months after her Zilretta® injection, and the second patient underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair 8 months after his Zilretta® injection.
| Demographic data | |
|---|---|
| Total patients | 39 |
| Mean age, year (range) | 55 (41–76) |
| Mean BMI, kg/m2 (range) | 29 (18–41) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Female | 28 (72) |
| Male | 11 (28) |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | |
| White | 33 (85) |
| Black | 3 (8) |
| Asian | 3 (8) |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | |
| Diabetic | 15 (39) |
| Thyroid disease | 4 (10) |
| Cancer | 5 (13) |
| Heart disease | 1 (3) |
| Depression | 6 (15) |
| Hypertension | 12 (31) |
| Prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery, n (%) | 1 (3) |
| Prior ipsilateral steroid injection before study period, n (%) | 4 (10) |
| Prior physical therapy before study period, n (%) | 10 (26) |
| Prior medications before study period, n (%) | 15 (38) |
| Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug | 10 (26) |
| Acetaminophen | 3 (8) |
| Oral steroid | 1 (3) |
| Topical gabapentin | 1 (3%) |
| History of adhesive capsulitis in contralateral shoulder, n (%) | 9 (23) |
| Duration of symptoms at presentation, months (range) | 3.6 (2–6) |
| Current tobacco use, n (%) | 4 (10) |
BMI: Body mass index
Visual analog pain scale
The VAS pain score improved from a mean of 5 at the time of injection to 1.4 by 6-week post-injection (p < 0.01). This significant improvement in VAS pain score persisted at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) relative to baseline, indicating sustained improvement [Figure 1].

American Shoulder and Elbow score
The ASES score improved from a mean of 43 at the time of injection to a mean of 80 post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in the mean ASES score after the 6-week follow-up (p > 0.05 for all comparisons), indicating continued improvement through 12-month follow-up [Figure 2].

Range of motion
Forward elevation improved from a mean of 117° at the time of injection to 173° at 3-month post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in mean forward elevation at the 3-month follow-up (p > 0.05 for all comparisons), indicating sustained improvement. Abduction improved from a mean of 98° at the time of injection to 162° at 3-month post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in mean abduction at the 3-month follow-up (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). External rotation with the arm adducted to the side improved from a mean of 32° at the time of injection to 59° at 6-week post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in the mean external rotation with the arm adducted after the 6-week follow-up (p > 0.05, all comparisons), indicating a sustained improvement [Figure 3]. External rotation in 90° of abduction, as well as internal rotation, did not demonstrate statistically significant changes.

Outcomes in diabetic patients
Fifteen (38%) patients had a prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Three of these patients carried a diagnosis of type I diabetes and twelve with type II diabetes. Eleven (73%) patients had adequate resolution of symptoms after undergoing injection and did not require any further treatment. The mean VAS pain score improved from a mean of 5.7 at the time of injection to 2.7 by 6-week post-injection (p < 0.01). This significant improvement was sustained until final follow-up, with mean VAS pain scores of 2.2 at 3 months (p < 0.01), 2.8 at 6 months (p < 0.01), and 1.6 at 12 months (p < 0.01). Improvements in pain were significantly less than those in the cohort of patients without diabetes at 6-week and 12-month follow-up, but no difference was seen at the 3- and 6-month time points [Table 2].
| n (%) | History of diabetes mellitus | No diabetes mellitus | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 (38%) | 24 (62%) | ||
| VAS pain scores, mean | |||
| Baseline | 5.7 | 4.6 | 0.13 |
| 6-week follow-up | 2.7 | 0.7 | <0.01 |
| 3-month follow-up | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.06 |
| 6-month follow-up | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.37 |
| 12-month follow-up | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.05 |
| ASES scores, mean | |||
| Baseline | 39 | 45 | 0.31 |
| 6-week follow-up | 70 | 86 | <0.01 |
| 3-month follow-up | 74 | 87 | 0.02 |
| 6-month follow-up | 66 | 80 | 0.1 |
| 12-month follow-up | 78 | 91 | 0.12 |
| Forward flexion, degrees | |||
| Baseline | 114 | 119 | 0.61 |
| 6-week follow-up | 151 | 159 | 0.46 |
| 3-month follow-up | 166 | 176 | 0.05 |
| 6-month follow-up | 156 | 176 | 0.05 |
| 12-month follow-up | 160 | 174 | 0.21 |
| Abduction, degrees | |||
| Baseline | 108 | 92 | 0.07 |
| 6-week follow-up | 140 | 143 | 0.84 |
| 3-month follow-up | 165 | 161 | 0.8 |
| 6-month follow-up | 159 | 177 | 0.04 |
| 12-month follow-up | 159 | 166 | 0.67 |
| External rotation at 0, degrees | |||
| Baseline | 31 | 28 | 0.63 |
| 6-week follow-up | 54 | 62 | 0.25 |
| 3-month follow-up | 58 | 65 | 0.41 |
| 6-month follow-up | 66 | 70 | 0.66 |
| 12-month follow-up | 58 | 75 | 0.06 |
VAS: Visual analog scale; ASES: American shoulder elbow society ; p value was determined to be statistically significant if p< 0.05; bold values indicated p<0.05.
ASES scores in the diabetes cohort improved from a mean of 39 at the time of injection to 70 post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in the mean ASES score after the 6-week follow-up (p > 0.05, for all comparisons), indicating improvement through 1-year follow-up. The improvements in ASES score were significantly smaller than those in the cohort of patients without diabetes at the 6-week and 3-month marks, but this difference became insignificant by 6 months [Table 2].
Forward elevation in the diabetic subgroup improved from a mean of 114° at the time of injection to 151° by 6-week post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no changes in the mean forward elevation after the 6-week follow-up (p > 0.05, all comparisons). Abduction in the diabetic subgroup improved from a mean of 108° at the time of injection to 165° at 3-month post-injection (p < 0.01). External rotation with the arm adducted to the side improved from a mean of 31° at the time of injection to 54° at 6-week post-injection (p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in external rotation with the arm adducted beyond this time point, indicating sustained improvement. There were minimal differences in the mean ROM improvements between the diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups [Table 2].
Adverse events
A total of 6 adverse reactions were noted in 4 patients and deemed possibly related. Two patients had redness at the injection site. In one patient, it resolved with aloe vera; in the other, it resolved with hydrocortisone cream for dermatitis. The other adverse reactions deemed possibly related were upper respiratory infection, a headache, increased emotional lability, and a new diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis during the study period. There was one incident of hyperglycemia in a patient with an underlying diagnosis of type I diabetes. This patient received her initial Zilretta® injection without complication. Six months following the initial injection, she underwent a second injection with standard corticosteroid, which resulted in an episode of hyperglycemia that resolved with conservative management. This event was deemed not related to her Zilretta® injection 6 months prior.
DISCUSSION
In this study, 82% of patients who underwent a single extended-release corticosteroid injection for acute, idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder did not require any further treatment for their symptoms. At 6 weeks after a single extended-release corticosteroid injection, there was pain relief that was maintained through a 1-year follow-up. PROMs improved significantly by 6 weeks post-injection and remained sustained at 1-year follow-up. Passive external rotation with the arm adducted improved from 32° at the time of injection to 59° at 6-week post-injection. Passive forward elevation and abduction were improved by 3 months after injection (117– 173° and 98–162°, respectively). Outcomes were comparable in both diabetic and non-diabetic patient subgroups.
Mean VAS pain scores at baseline in this study cohort were consistent with those reported in studies investigating intraarticular steroid use for adhesive capsulitis.[4,9,20] The current study revealed a rapid reduction in VAS scores within the first 6 weeks and the preservation of these improvements through the 1-year mark. While direct comparisons are difficult, the early follow-up results appear at least non-inferior to those reported in the existing literature on standard intra-articular corticosteroid injections. Yoon et al. reported a VAS pain improvement from 5.2 to 2.4 at 12-week follow-up in a cohort of 20 patients who received a 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide injection for adhesive capsulitis.[9] In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, Ranalletta et al. reported a reduction in VAS scores from 7.6 at baseline to 1.1 at 12-week follow-up in a cohort of 37 patients receiving betamethasone.[4] However, both of these studies are limited by their short-term follow-up. In a few studies that have examined longer-term follow-up (beyond 3 months) after intra-articular corticosteroid use, efficacy wanes over time.[21-24] Ryans et al. showed that a standard intra-articular corticosteroid injection was associated with a significant improvement in VAS scores compared to physical therapy alone at 6-week follow-up, but by 16-week follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups.[24] Bal et al. and Van der Windt et al. also reported similar findings, with early improvements in pain after injection but minimal differences between intra-articular steroid and physical therapy alone at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively.[22,23] The current study cohort had both quick pain relief and sustained relief at longer-term follow-up, which suggests that further studies investigating possible non-inferiority (or superiority) of extended-release corticosteroid injection are warranted.
PROMs following injection were analyzed and improved significantly from 43 to 80 by 6-week post-injection, which is similar to the effects of standard intra-articular steroid. For example, one clinical trial reported an improvement in ASES scores from a mean baseline of 42–81 at 4 weeks of follow-up after betamethasone injection.[4] That study, however, reported only outcome scores at a final follow-up of 12 weeks. The findings of Sun et al. suggest that standard steroid injection benefits wane and are equivalent to therapy by 24 weeks. Using an extended-release formulation, our cohort maintained improvements through the 1-year follow-up.[10] The results of the current study showed that the early benefit of the extended-release corticosteroid injection persisted, perhaps related to the extended-release nature of this novel medication compared with standard corticosteroids.
Passive ROM was analyzed in this study with significant improvements in passive external rotation with the arm adducted at 6 weeks, passive forward elevation at 3 months, and passive abduction at 3 months. The results in the present study appear consistent with other reported data. For instance, Ryans et al. reported an approximately 20° improvement in passive external rotation at 16-week post-injection.[24] The current study demonstrated an approximately 30° improvement in passive external rotation during the 3–4-month follow-up period.
Patients with a prior history of diabetes mellitus were specifically analyzed, and this cohort demonstrated significant improvements in mean VAS pain scores, mean ASES scores, mean forward flexion, and mean external rotation with the arm adducted at 6 weeks post-injection. Mean abduction was also significantly improved in this cohort by 3-month post-injection. All of these improvements were sustained for 1 year. Given that adhesive capsulitis affects up to 36% of diabetic patients (far exceeding the 2–5% reported in the general population), evaluating treatments specifically in this subgroup is of great clinical value.[25,26] Adhesive capsulitis also tends to be more severe and recalcitrant to conservative management in the diabetic population. Erickson et al. showed that diabetic patients presented with worse forward elevation and failed conservative management more often.[27] Those authors further demonstrated that adhesive capsulitis was less likely to resolve after one standard corticosteroid injection and required capsular release more often in the diabetic cohort.[27] It is therefore of paramount importance to report on the outcomes of extended-release corticosteroid injection in this patient population. Perhaps unsurprisingly, non-diabetics showed greater improvement in pain and ASES scores at certain time points. Another outcome that should be studied in the future with glenohumeral joint steroid injections is post-injection fluctuations in blood sugar. There is the potential that extended-release medications could limit the bolus effect of standard steroid injections, but this will require additional investigation.
The non-blinded nature of this study introduced bias into PROMs, such as pain and ASES scores. Passive ROM recordings were unaffected by this, since they are unbiased, objective data points for patient improvement. The relatively small patient cohort made it difficult to perform robust subgroup analyses among diabetic patients due to insufficient statistical power. There were four patients who received shoulder steroid injections before the study period. These injections were performed at outside institutions, and thus, the rationale for these prior injections was limited. The cohort size also limited the ability to detect rare adverse reactions to the injection, although it is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of knee OA. During the follow-up period, there was a loss of follow-up for unknown reasons that could have impacted the results. This makes the current study susceptible to attrition bias toward either positive or negative outcomes. Patients may not have returned for evaluation for many possible reasons, such as an asymptomatic shoulder or worsening symptoms that prompt a second opinion. Finally, the current study lacked a control group, which makes it impossible to determine whether extended-release corticosteroid injection is superior to standard intra-articular steroid injection. In addition, without a control group, it is difficult to determine how extended-release may have affected the natural history of frozen shoulder, as it may improve over time without intervention.[28] However, this was not the goal of the phase-2 study, which focused on efficacy and safety.
CONCLUSION
A single extended-release corticosteroid injection was associated with sustained pain relief, improvement in PROs, and increased ROM in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.
Authors’ contributions:
ZVB, AJH, and AJI: Participated in data analysis and the preparation of the original manuscript; FWG, SFB, and BCW: Conceived and designed the study, acquired funding, performed data collection, interpreted data, and contributed to the manuscript final draft. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the manuscript’s content and similarity index.
Ethical approval:
The authors of the current study agree that the study was approved and registered as a clinical trial under NCT04831255 on June 21, 2019. The current study was also approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board under approval reference number IRB-HSR #21584.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Conflicts of interest:
ZB, AH, and AI have no conflicts of interest. FG has the following disclosures: Stryker Sports Medicine, which includes consulting or advisory. AlloSource, which includes consulting or advisory services. Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine that includes: board membership. Royalties from Elsevier for various publications. SB has the following disclosures: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine: Board or committee member. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons: Board or committee member. AOSSM MPBOT, Video Journal of Sports Medicine: Editorial or governing board; Publishing royalties, financial or material support. Arthrex, Inc: Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker; Research support. Association of Clinical Elbow and Shoulder. Surgeons: Board or committee member. Biomet: IP royalties. Exactech, Inc: IP royalties; Paid consultant; Paid presenter or speaker. Stock or stock Options. Johnson & Johnson: Stock or stock Options. MidAtlantic Shoulder and Elbow Society: Board or committee member. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine: Editorial or governing board. Springer: Publishing royalties, financial or material support. Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: Editorial or governing board. WRS: Paid consultant. Zimmer: IP royalties. BW has the following disclosures: financial support was provided by Pacira BioSciences Inc. Pacira BioSciences, Inc that includes: consulting or advisory services. Research support - Arthrex, Zimmer Biomet, Pacira; Consultant - Arthrex, Lifenet, Editorial Board - Journal of Arthroscopy.
Financial support and sponsorship: Funding for this study was provided by Pacira BioSciences, Inc., and the study is registered as trial NCT04831255.
References
- Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:536-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adhesive capsulitis: A review of current treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2346-56.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nonoperative management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: Oral cortisone application versus intra-articular cortisone injections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:172-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corticosteroid injections accelerate pain relief and recovery of function compared with oral NSAIDs in patients with adhesive capsulitis: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:474-81.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manipulation or intra-articular steroids in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:348-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Early intra-articular corticosteroid injection improves pain and function in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: 1-year retrospective longitudinal study. PM R. 2018;10:19-27.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intraarticular corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1947-52.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Good results after fluoroscopic-guided intra-articular injections in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1435-41.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Optimal dose of intraarticular corticosteroids for adhesive capsulitis: A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1133-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steroid injection versus physiotherapy for patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A PRIMSA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3469.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The effect of corticosteroid injection into rotator interval for early frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:663-70.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- High-vs low-dose corticosteroid injection in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis with severe pain: A randomized controlled double-blind study. Pain Med. 2018;19:735-41.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: An update. J Ultrasound. 2023;26:593-604.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- An intra-articular, extended-release formulation of triamcinolone acetonide prolongs and amplifies analgesic effect in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:877-88.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brief report: A phase IIb trial of a novel extended-release microsphere formulation of triamcinolone acetonide for intraarticular injection in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:204-11.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of a single intra-articular injection of a microsphere formulation of triamcinolone acetonide on knee osteoarthritis pain: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:666-77.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Synovial and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) following intra-articular (IA) injection of an extended-release microsphere-based formulation (FX006) or standard crystalline suspension in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26:34-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sustained efficacy of a single intra-articular dose of FX006 in a rat model of repeated localized knee arthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:151-60.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release in patients with osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes: A randomized, phase 2 study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57:2235-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frozen shoulder-a prospective randomized clinical trial. World J Orthop. 2017;8:394-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003:CD004016.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effectiveness of corticosteroid injection in adhesive capsulitis. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:503-12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: Randomised trial. BMJ. 1998;317:1292-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular triamcinolone and/or physiotherapy in shoulder capsulitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:529-35.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The impact of pre-existing shoulder diseases and traumatic injuries of the shoulder on adhesive capsulitis in adult population: A population-based nested case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e17204.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adhesive capsulitis: demographics and predictive factors for success following steroid injections and surgical intervention. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019;1:e35-40.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Natural history of frozen shoulder: Fact or fiction? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017;103:40-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
