Translate this page into:
Erratum: Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Read CORRECTED-ARTICLE associated with this - 10.25259/JMSR_152_2021
In the article entitled “Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis” published in the Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research on page 9, Issue 1, Volume 6, January-March 2022,[1] the following information is printed incorrectly.
The degree of the author Timo Siepmann wrongly published as PhD
The affiliation of the author Miluska Bromley published wrongly as “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States”
The affiliation of the author Karim Mahmoud published wrongly as “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States”
The correct information to be read as under.
The degree of the author Timo Siepmann is MD, FAHA
The affiliation of the author Miluska Bromley is “Department of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University, Instituto Ivo Pitanguy, Sao Paulo, Brazil”
The affiliation of the author Karim Mahmoud is “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Augusta, Georgia”
References
- Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2022;6:9-18.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
