Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Erratum
6 (
2
); 192-192
doi:
10.25259/JMSR_152_2021_ER

Erratum: Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Read CORRECTED-ARTICLE associated with this - 10.25259/JMSR_152_2021

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

In the article entitled “Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis” published in the Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research on page 9, Issue 1, Volume 6, January-March 2022,[1] the following information is printed incorrectly.

  1. The degree of the author Timo Siepmann wrongly published as PhD

  2. The affiliation of the author Miluska Bromley published wrongly as “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States”

  3. The affiliation of the author Karim Mahmoud published wrongly as “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States”

The correct information to be read as under.

  1. The degree of the author Timo Siepmann is MD, FAHA

  2. The affiliation of the author Miluska Bromley is “Department of Plastic Surgery, Sao Paulo University, Instituto Ivo Pitanguy, Sao Paulo, Brazil

  3. The affiliation of the author Karim Mahmoud is “Department of Orthopedics, Augusta Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Specialist, Augusta, Georgia

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ankle fractures in patients above the age of 50: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2022;6:9-18.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
6,829

PDF downloads
825
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections