Translate this page into:
From multidisciplinary to interdisciplinary: Redesigning rehabilitation pathways for complex cases
*Corresponding author: Tarek M. El-Gohary, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. dr.elgoharyt@yahoo.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: El-Gohary TM. From multidisciplinary to interdisciplinary: Redesigning rehabilitation pathways for complex cases. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2025;9:411-2. doi: 10.25259/JMSR_303_2025
In rehabilitation, a multidisciplinary approach involves various professionals working independently toward patient care, whereas an interdisciplinary approach emphasizes collaborative planning and shared decision-making.[1-4] The interdisciplinary approach fosters integrated, patient-centered outcomes. In physical therapy and rehabilitation, the interdisciplinary model fosters effective communication across specialties, enhancing continuity of care and promoting functional recovery. While both models involve multiple disciplines, the interdisciplinary approach is more cohesive, with professionals working jointly to set goals and strategies.[3,4] This synergy is particularly effective in managing complex cases such as chronic neuromuscular conditions, diabetic complications, and chronic musculoskeletal pain, where coordinated care plays a vital role in improving functional mobility and overall quality of life.[1,5-8]
In the evolving field of physical therapy and rehabilitation, managing complex cases necessitates a shift away from traditional models of parallel care delivery. The multidisciplinary approach has long been standard in clinical practice. In this model, subspecialties function independently within their respective domains.[2,6,7] However, its limitations become evident in cases that require coordinated, patient-centered interventions. These challenges have prompted a necessary shift toward an interdisciplinary approach, where disciplines actively integrate their expertise, collaborate in shared decision-making, and coordinate their treatment objectives to construct a comprehensive and dynamic care plan. This model facilitates effective communication among subspecialties and optimizes clinical outcomes by addressing the full scope of a patient’s impairments and functional limitations.[3,4] In complex rehabilitation scenarios, fragmented care often leads to redundant assessments, conflicting interventions, or suboptimal recovery.
In contrast, an interdisciplinary framework fosters functional gains, enhances patient adherence, and supports the achievement of long-term goals.[3,4] Effective rehabilitation increasingly requires a shift from traditional multidisciplinary models, in which disciplines work independently in parallel, to interdisciplinary frameworks that promote integrated and goal-oriented care. This editorial explores the clinical significance of this paradigm shift.
In multidisciplinary care models, specialists contribute their expertise independently, often working alongside one another without genuine integration. This parallel approach can hinder the delivery of cohesive, patient-centered care, particularly in complex cases such as neurorehabilitation, diabetic complications, and chronic musculoskeletal pain.[1,2,5-8] A more effective model is the interdisciplinary approach, which encourages continuous interaction, shared decision-making, and coordinated planning among all members of the care team.[3,4]
CASE EXAMPLE
A 37-year-old female presented with persistent facial asymmetry, muscle tightness, and involuntary facial movements (synkinesis), 2 years after developing Bell’s palsy during pregnancy. The patient was unable to receive timely pharmacologic treatment due to fetal safety concerns, which contributed to incomplete neural recovery. In the years following, the patient had trouble with emotional expression, persistent facial synkinesis and dyskinesis, affecting both her motor function and psychosocial well-being. Initial management followed a multidisciplinary model, involving physical therapy, speech therapy, and neurology. However, the lack of synchronized goals led to fragmented interventions, each addressing parts of her condition without a cohesive strategy. As a result, treatment efforts failed to produce meaningful improvement in her facial control or quality of life. The shift to an interdisciplinary approach proved transformative, enabling coordinated, goal-driven care that addressed the patient’s complex functional and psychosocial needs. A coordinated care team developed a unified treatment plan with shared goals and regular communication. Facial neuromuscular retraining, provided by a physical therapist, was integrated with speech therapy to enhance oral-motor control. Psychological intervention focused on body image disturbances and social anxiety. Weekly interdisciplinary meetings allowed the team to co-develop functional goals, share observations in real-time, and adjust treatment dynamically. Within 3 months, the patient demonstrated improved facial symmetry, reduced involuntary movements, and greater self-efficacy in social interactions. This case highlights how interdisciplinary rehabilitation, where subspecialties work in concert rather than in parallel, offers clear advantages over traditional multidisciplinary models. Care algorithms and referral pathways played a pivotal role in providing successful rehabilitation. Through collaborative goal-setting and ongoing monitoring, the interdisciplinary model delivers individualized, holistic care that mitigates risk and effectively addresses the multifactorial challenges inherent in complex rehabilitation cases.[3,4,9,10]
This editorial advocates for a paradigm shift from multidisciplinary to genuinely interdisciplinary rehabilitation, emphasizing coordinated, patient-centered care that unites subspecialties in pursuit of long-term functional goals.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The author confirms that there was no use of AI-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicting relationships or activities.
Financial support and sponsorship: This editorial did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Delivering multidisciplinary rehabilitation care in Parkinson's disease: An international consensus statement. J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14:135-66.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of the falls and fractures clinic as an integrated multidisciplinary model of care in Australia: A pre-post study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027013.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of early interdisciplinary rehabilitation for trauma patients: A systematic review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020;2:100070.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Efficacy of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for improving function in people with chronic pain. Pain Res Treat. 2016;2016:7217684.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Improving physician-patient communication in rehabilitation: Is the patient's understanding truly verified? J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2024;8:430-2.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Getting a foothold on diabetic foot disease-outcomes of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for inpatient diabetic foot care: A 17-year institutional review. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2025;24:177-85.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary limb preservation program in reducing regional hospitalization rates for patients with diabetes-related foot complications. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2025;24:117-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enhancing physician-patient communication in neurology: Is the patient's comprehension adequately assessed? J Neurosurg Sci. 2025;69:139-40.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evidence for early and regular physical therapy and exercise in Parkinson's disease. Semin Neurol. 2021;41:189-205.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Physiotherapist-led rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: Interventions and promising long-term outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:910.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]