Translate this page into:
Genetics of osteopetrosis: Molecular insights and clinical implications
*Corresponding author: Sulman Basit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine & Center for Genetics and Inherited Diseases, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia. sbasit.phd@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Basit S, Khoshhal KI. Genetics of Osteopetrosis: Molecular insights and clinical implications. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. doi: 10.25259/JMSR_357_2025
Abstract
The balance between bone resorption and formation is critical for bone and mineral homeostasis. The imbalance of this process leads to several bone diseases, including bone loss or excessive bone density. Osteopetrosis is a rare genetic disorder characterized by defective bone resorption due to impaired osteoclast function, resulting in excessive bone density, which paradoxically leads to a higher incidence of fractures. These fractures are difficult to heal due to impaired bone remodeling. Osteopetrosis manifests in autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (OPTA) and autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (OPTB) forms. OPTA is caused by heterozygous variations in genes such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) (affecting Wnt signaling), chloride voltage-gated channel 7 (CLCN7) (a chloride channel), and pleckstrin homology and RUN domain containing M1 (PLEKHM1) (involved in vesicular transport), resulting in osteosclerosis with variable skeletal complications. OPTB, caused by biallelic variants in genes such as T-cell immune regulator 1 (TCIRG1) (V-ATPase subunit), tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11)/TNFRSF11A (osteoclast differentiation), CA2 (acid-base balance), and osteoclastogenesis Associated Transmembrane Protein 1 (OSTM1) (osteoclast maturation), presents with severe skeletal dysplasia, fractures, hematopoietic deficits, and neuropathies. Central to pathogenesis is the disruption of osteoclast acidification and resorption machinery. Genes such as TCIRG1, CLCN7, and CA2 are crucial for establishing the acidic microenvironment required for bone degradation. The TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A pathway, essential for osteoclast differentiation through nuclear factor-kappa B and MAPK signaling, highlights a therapeutic duality: overactivity causes osteoporosis, while inactivating mutations lead to osteopetrosis. Next-generation sequencing enables variant detection, but genetic heterogeneity and modifiers complicate prognosis. Epigenetic regulators, including non-coding RNAs, further influence disease severity. Personalized medicine, which integrates genetic insights with novel therapies, holds promise, while early diagnosis and multidisciplinary care remain essential. Ongoing research into unresolved genetic and mechanistic factors is critical to optimizing treatment strategies.
Keywords
Osteopetrosis
genetic variants
bone resorption
osteoclast
SLC29A3
T-cell immune regulator 1
CLCN7
molecular genetics
marble bone disease
skeletal dysplasia
INTRODUCTION
Osteopetrosis, also known as marble bone disease, is a rare hereditary skeletal disorder. It affects approximately 1 in 20,000 births for the dominant type and 1 in 250,000 for the recessive form.[1,2] It is characterized by increased bone mass resulting from the abnormal functioning and differentiation of osteoclasts, as well as arrested bone resorption.[1] The inadequate bone resorption in osteopetrosis results in bone hardening, which paradoxically causes bones to become brittle and fracture easily. Due to impaired bone remodeling, these fractures are difficult. Surgery and other invasive procedures carry high complication rates. Dense, fragile bones are difficult to operate on safely. Children affected by this condition typically experience delayed growth and development. Many patients experience a significant reduction in adult height. Macrocephaly and dental anomalies are also manifested.[2] Based on its phenotypic features, osteopetrosis can be classified as ranging from asymptomatic to severe forms. The variation arises either from a failure in the normal recruitment of osteoclasts or from a dysfunction in the resorptive activity of the differentiated cells.[3] Autosomal dominant forms of inherited osteopetrosis usually show mild clinical features, while the severe form of the disease is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern.[2,4] Radiographic features such as the “bone-within-a-bone” appearance and “sandwich vertebrae” are characteristic of osteopetrosis and can help distinguish it from other high bone mass (HBM) conditions [Figure 1]. Understanding the pathogenesis of osteopetrosis requires an insight into the normal development and function of osteoclasts. This review aims to bridge the gap between molecular genetics and the clinical management of osteopetrosis, offering an integrated perspective on diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies.

- Radiographs of a 2-year-old female patient with opteopetrosis. (a) Lower Limbs; The tibiae and fibulae appear unusually radiodense, suggesting diffuse sclerosis. Corticomedullary differentiation is lost. The metaphyseal ends look slightly flared, compatible with the Erlenmeyer flask deformity. (b) The ribs, clavicles, and scapulae show diffuse sclerosis. The vertebral bodies show loss of internal trabecular pattern. Humeral heads and clavicles are also dense with indistinct marrow cavities. (c) AP view of the lower limbs. Diffuse, generalized osteosclerosis involving the femora, tibiae, and fibulae. A “bone within bone” appearance, particularly visible at the metaphyseal regions. The metaphyses appear widened and club-shaped, and the growth plates are sclerotic and irregular, consistent with defective bone remodeling. (d) Generalized increased density of metatarsals, tarsals, and phalanges. The ossification centers appear unusually opaque. Some areas may exhibit the bone-within-bone pattern.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOPETROSIS
Osteopetrosis belongs to a broader spectrum of high bone mass disorders, and distinguishing it from other congenital and acquired causes is essential for accurate diagnosis and management. Among the congenital forms, sclerosteosis and Van Buchem disease, caused by loss of sclerostin (SOST) function, are characterized by progressive cranial hyperostosis and, in the case of sclerosteosis, syndactyly, and tall stature. Pycnodysostosis, due to cathepsin K (CTSK) mutations, presents with short stature, acro-osteolysis of the distal phalanges, and delayed closure of cranial sutures. Other sclerosing bone dysplasias, such as LRP5-related high bone mass syndromes, may mimic osteopetrosis radiographically but differ in clinical expressivity. Acquired forms of increased bone density include renal osteodystrophy, which is associated with chronic kidney disease and metabolic disturbances, and skeletal fluorosis, which arises from excessive fluoride exposure and leads to dense but brittle bones. Radiographic features such as the “bone-within-a-bone” appearance and “sandwich vertebrae” are characteristic of osteopetrosis and can help distinguish it from other high bone mass conditions. Ultimately, the integration of clinical features, radiographic findings, biochemical testing, and molecular genetics is crucial to differentiate osteopetrosis from other sclerotic bone disorders.
OSTEOCLAST DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTION
Osteoclasts are polykaryon phagocytic cells derived and differentiated from hematopoietic stem cells.[5] Osteoclasts are specialized cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, derived from hematopoietic precursors. Their differentiation involves cell–cell fusion, resulting in the formation of multinucleated giant cells; a critical process for osteoclastogenesis and the acquisition of full resorptive function.[6] Osteoclastogenesis is a highly regulated and complex process that relies on two essential cytokines: Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) ligand (tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 11 [TNFSF11]) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF).[3,7-10] The absence of either M-CSF or TNFSF11 – or their respective receptors (Csfr1r and Tnfrsf11a) leads to a failure in osteoclast development, resulting in an osteopetrotic phenotype.[8,11,12] Osteoclasts are distinguished by their specialized capacity to resorb substantial amounts of bone and serve as the principal bone-resorbing cells.[13] Dysfunction of osteoclasts results in a deficiency of bone turnover, leading to several diseases characterized by systemic and local bone loss, including osteopetrosis.
The development and function of osteoclasts are under tight control of osteoblast-like cells. For instance, M-CSF and TNFSF11 are produced by the osteoblasts, and thus, they regulate the differentiation of osteoclasts.[5,14,15] Therefore, the stimulation of osteoblasts results in enhanced osteoclast activity. Cell-to-cell communication/signaling between the two cell types plays a crucial role. Increasing evidence suggests direct interactions between osteoclasts and osteoblasts.[14,16] Altered cell-to-cell communication/signaling results in a misbalance of bone remodeling and osteopetrosis. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms governing osteoclastogenesis remain incompletely understood. Therefore, understanding the development and function of osteoclasts will undoubtedly improve the understanding of bone diseases, including osteopetrosis. Moreover, understanding the genetic etiology is crucial for effective diagnosis and therapy.
GENETIC BASIS OF OSTEOPETROSIS
Osteopetrosis results from variants in the genes that encode proteins essential for osteoclast function. Variants causing osteopetrosis can be inherited in an autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, and X-linked manner [Tables 1 and 2].[17] Some important genes and their variations are discussed below.
| OMIM | Gene | Salient Clinical Features | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal | Non-skeletal | |||
| OPTA1 | LRP5 | Osteosclerosis, Calvarial sclerosis and thickened cranial vault | Hearing loss, and headache | [20] |
| OPTA2 | CLCN7 | Osteosclerosis, multiple fractures, skull base sclerosis, vertebral endplate thickening, and hip osteoarthritis | Nerve palsy, and vision loss | [21] |
| OPTA3 | PLEKHM1 | Osteosclerosis of skull, Sclerotic calvarium, ‘Sandwich’ vertebrae | Hepatosplenomegaly anemia | [22] |
OMIM: Online Mendelian inheritance in man, OPTA1: Autosomal dominant osyeopetrosis type 1
| OMIM | Gene | Salient clinical features | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal | Non-skeletal | |||
| OPTB1 | TCIRG1 | Osteomyelitis, sandwich appearance of vertebral bodies, coxa vara, splayed metaphyses, and macrocephaly | Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, deafness, blindness, extraocular muscle paralysis, cranial nerve palsy, and anemia | [1] |
| OPTB2 | TNFSF11 | Osteosclerosis, osteomyelitis, cranial hyperostosis, multiple fractures, and genu valgum | Blindness, hepatosplenomegaly, facial paralysis, dental anomalies, and anemia | [29] |
| OPTB3 | CA2 | Recurrent fractures, short stature, failure to thrive, and postnatal growth retardation | Intellectual impairment, developmental delay, optic nerve pallor, hearing loss, and renal tubular acidosis | [30] |
| OPTB4 | CLCN7 | Osteosclerosis, narrow medullary space, bone-within-bone appearance in iliac wings, and growth retardation | Hepatosplenomegaly, visual impairment, optic nerve atrophy, Bell’s palsy, and anemia | [31] |
| OPTB5 | OSTM1 | Osteosclerosis, short stature, abnormal thickening of trabeculae, fractures, microcephaly, and irregular metaphyses | Hypotonia, hepatosplenomegaly, visual impairment, retinal depigmentation, and cerebral atrophy | [32] |
| OPTB6 | PLEKHM1 | Osteosclerosis, deformity of distal femora and proximal tibiae, and band-like sclerosis of vertebral endplates | None | [33] |
| OPTB7 | TNFRSF11A | Multiple rib fractures, increase of bony and cartilaginous trabeculae, macrocephaly, and thickened bone of vertebrae | Hypotonia, optic and olfactory nerve atrophy, hepatosplenomegaly, hypotonia, psychomotor retardation, and recurrent pneumonia | [34] |
| OPTB8 | SNX10 | Osteosclerosis, ossified bones, macrocephaly, frontal bossing, and failure to thrive | Facial nerve palsy, vision loss, narrowed auditory canal, anemia, and hepatosplenomegaly, | [35] |
| OPTB9 | SLC4A2 | Osteosclerosis, and spontaneous fractures, Osteopetrotic compression of optic nerves | Reduced vision, renal failure, pulmonary stenosis, and anemia, Hyperparathyroidism | [36] |
OMIM: Online Mendelian inheritance in man, OPTB1: Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis type 1, OPTB2: Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis type 2
Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (OPTA)
Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis is characterized by generalized osteoporosis with a wide intrafamilial and interfamilial clinical variability.[18,19] A distinctive “bone-in-bone” appearance is a hallmark of OPTA.[19] It is a late-onset disease with mild clinical features compared to autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (OPTB). Moreover, the disease progression is slow in OPTA. Therefore, OPTA shows a better overall prognosis.[19] The OPTA has been shown to result from missense variants in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5, MIM 603506, and OPTA1) encoding gene,[20] chloride channel 7 (CLCN7, MIM 602727, and OPTA2) encoding gene,[21] and pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein, family M, member 1 (PLEKHM1, MIM 611467, and OPTA3) encoding gene.[22]
OPTA1 (MIM 607634) is characterized by diffuse, generalized osteosclerosis.[23] Pronounced sclerosis is observed in the calvaria, and a variable degree of sclerosis is present in the spine region. Sclerosis progresses with age. An increased fracture rate is not observed in OPTA1.[24] OPTA1 results from activating variants in LPR5, leading to increased osteoblastic bone formation.[23]
OPTA2 (MIM 166600), also known as AlbersSchönberg disease, is a late-onset disease.[21] OPTA2 is characterized by diffuse symmetrical osteosclerosis with increased long-bone fracture rates.[25] Pronounced skull base sclerosis and hip osteoarthritis are also features of OPTA2. Narrowed nerve canals in the skull due to bone overgrowth compress cranial nerves, often resulting in vision loss, hearing impairment, and facial paralysis. Heterozygous variants in the CLCN7 are the main cause of OPTA2.[26]
OPTA3 (OMIM 618107) is characterized by a generalized increase in the density of long bones and the narrowing of the bone marrow cavity due to bone overgrowth, crowding out the marrow space. This causes severe anemia, increased infections, and bleeding disorders. Recurrent fractures with minor trauma are also observed.[27] The skull in OPTA3 patients is osteosclerotic, characterized by localized osteosclerosis and thickening of the calvarium.[22] Hepatosplenomegaly and missing teeth are also observed in OPTA3. Heterozygous variants in the PLEKHM1 gene cause the OPTA3 phenotype.[22,27]
OPTB
OPTB is a more severe form of osteopetrosis and has an early onset. It is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder and is fatal in early childhood if left untreated.[28] The OPTB have been shown to result from homozygous deletion, splicing, missense, non-sense, and frameshift variants in the T-cell immune regulator 1 (TCIRG1) (TCIRG1, MIM 604592, and OPTB1) encoding gene,[1] tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily, member 11 (TNFSF11, MIM 602642, and OPTB2) encoding gene,[29] carbonic anhydrase II (CA2, MIM 611492, and OPTB3) encoding gene,[30] chloride channel 7 (CLCN7, MIM 602727, and OPTB4) encoding gene,[31] osteopetrosis-associated transmembrane protein 1 (OSTM1, MIM 607649, and OPTB5) encoding gene,[32] pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein, family M, member 1 (PLEKHM1, MIM 611467, OPTB6) encoding gene,[33] tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11A (TNFRSF11A, MIM 603499, and OPTB7) encoding gene,[34] sorting nexin 10 (SNX10, MIM 614780, and OPTB8) encoding gene,[35] and solute carrier family 4 (anion exchanger), member 2 (SLC4A2, MIM 109280, and OPTB9).[36]
OPTB1 (MIM 259700) is characterized by osteomyelitis, uniformly dense skeleton, fractures, the sandwich appearance of vertebral bodies, coxa vara, facial paralysis, blindness, deafness, and hepatosplenomegaly.[1,37,38] Biallelic variants in the TCIRG1 gene are known to cause OPTB1.[1]
The clinical features in OPTB2 (MIM 259710) include osteosclerosis, osteomyelitis, genu valgum, and hyperostosis of the skull and limbs.[39] Dental anomalies, including tooth crown malformation, dental caries, and retention of deciduous teeth, are also reported.[40] Early blindness due to optic atrophy and hepatosplenomegaly is also common features of OPTB2.[41] Homozygous variants in the TNFSF11 gene cause the OPTB2 phenotype.[29]
OPTB3 (MIM 259730) is characterized by postnatal growth retardation, short stature, and multiple fractures.[42] Moreover, OPTB3 patients show hearing loss, developmental delay, and intellectual disability.[43,44] Malocclusion, persistent primary teeth, and dental caries are also observed.[45] Mixed proximal and distal renal tubular acidosis is a hallmark of OPTB3.[46] Homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the CA2 gene are the underlying cause of OPTB3.[47,48]
OPTB4 (MIM 611490) is a severe form of osteopetrosis with generalized increased bone density, increased trabecular size, and sclerosis of the base of the skull and vertebral endplates.[49,50] Growth retardation, early onset visual impairment, and hepatosplenomegaly are also observed.[31] OPTB4 is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the CLCN7 gene.[31,51]
The most severe form of OPTB is OPTB5 (MIM 259720). The clinical features observed in OPTB5 include growth failure, short stature, generalized increase in bone density, loss of cortico-medullary differentiation, hypocellular bone marrow, reduced bone marrow space, abnormal thickening of the trabeculae, reduced number of osteoclasts, microcephaly, sclerosis of vertebrae, metaphyseal flaring, multiple fractures, hepatosplenomegaly, rib sclerosis, cerebral atrophy, atrophy of corpus callosum and brainstem, and motor nerve conduction abnormalities.[52-55] OPTB5 is caused by homozygous variants in the OSTM1 gene.[56-58]
Clinically, OPTB6 (MIM 611497) is characterized by band-like sclerosis of vertebral endplates (“rugger-jersey” spine), cortical sclerosis of pelvic bones, non-homogeneous sclerosis of metadiaphyses (distal femora, tibiae, and fibulae, and proximal fibulae and tibiae), and “Erlenmeyer flask” deformity of distal femora and proximal tibiae.[33] Only one published report is available on OPTB6, and homozygous variants in the PLEKHM1 gene lead to the OPTB6 phenotype.[33]
Skeletal abnormalities in OPTB7 (MIM 612301) are increased bone density, increased head circumference, thickened bone of vertebrae, multiple fractures, and increased bony and cartilaginous trabeculae. Non-skeletal features include nystagmus, vision loss, atrophy of the optic and olfactory nerves, and hepatosplenomegaly. Psychomotor retardation, motor delay, enlarged lateral ventricles, and hypotonia are also observed.[34] OPTB7 is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the TNFRSF11A gene.[59]
The clinical features of OPTB8 (MIM 615085) are macrocephaly, open fontanel, narrow optic and auditory canals, facial nerve palsy, unilateral and/or bilateral vision loss, and hepatosplenomegaly.[60,61] Variants in the sorting nexin 10 (SNX10) gene are the underlying cause of OPTB8.[35,62]
OPTB9 (MIM 620366) is characterized by spontaneous fractures and sclerosis of the skull base, calvarium, vertebral bodies, proximal femur, and ribs.[36] Extraskeletal features include chronic progressive renal failure, bilateral papilledema, and anemia. Deficiency of solute carrier family 4 member 2 (SLC4A2) is the cause of the OPTB9 phenotype.[36]
MOLECULAR PATHWAYS AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The genes mutated in OPTA and OPTB primarily involve bone metabolism, osteoclast differentiation, and osteoclast function. Most of these genes interact with one another to maintain a balance between bone formation and bone resorption. Impairment of this homeostasis due to variants in these genes leads to osteopetrosis.
Bone resorption and osteoclast function
The primary theme that interlinks many of these genes (such as CLCN7, TCIRG1, OSTM1, PLEKHM1, SNX10, and CA2) is their involvement in osteoclast function and bone resorption.[63] For instance, pathogenic variants in PLEKHM1 and SNX10 impair vesicular trafficking within the osteoclasts, a process essential for their proper function.[64] SNX10 plays a critical role in regulating osteoclast precursor fusion and determining osteoclast size.[63] Homozygous mutant mice for Snx10 exhibit dysregulated and continuous cell fusion, resulting in the formation of abnormally large, non-functional osteoclasts.[63] Similarly, mice mutant for the Ostm1 gene disrupts normal protein function during osteoclast maturation, leading to an excessive population of oversized osteoclasts. These findings suggest that Ostm1 can act as a negative regulator of pre-osteoclast fusion.[65] Osteoclasts are highly specialized cells responsible for bone resorption during the continuous process of skeletal remodeling. This process requires a highly acidic environment in the resorption lacuna. Genes such as CA2, SLC4A2, CLCN7, and TCIRG1 are encoding enzymes and channel proteins that are involved in maintaining the acid-base balance. They maintain the pH necessary for osteoclasts to perform the function of bone resorption. To create an acidic environment, protons (H+) are actively transported across the osteoclast membrane by the osteoclast-specific vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) “proton pump.”[66] The a3 subunit of V-ATPase is encoded by the TCIRG1 gene. In addition, CLCN7 plays a crucial role in facilitating efficient proton pumping by V-ATPase.[31] CLCN7 encodes chloride voltage-gated channel 7, which functions as a Cl−/H+ antiporter. This channel works in conjunction with V-ATPase to promote the acidification of the extracellular resorption lacuna, thereby regulating both bone resorption and the processes of bone calcification and degradation.[46] Moreover, osteoclasts with CA2 deficiency cannot acidify their “sealing zone” due to failure in catalyzing the formation of HCO3− and H+ ions.[67] Furthermore, SLC4A2 (encoding anion exchanger 2) is involved in exchanging Cl− with HCO3−.[36,68] Variants in SLC4A2 decrease the anion exchange activity of SLC4A2 transporters, thus impairing osteoclastogenesis.[36,68]
TNFSF11-TNFRSF11A pathway and osteoclast differentiation
The interaction between TNFSF11 and its receptor (TNFRSF11A) is essential for osteoclast differentiation and the process of bone resorption.[6] Dysregulation of this pathway can lead to osteopetrosis. For instance, deficiency of Tnfsf11 in mice leads to the absence of osteoclasts and osteoblasts.[69] TNFSF11 is a ligand that is primarily expressed on osteoblasts and stromal cells. It is also expressed in T-cells and dendritic cells. TNFRSF11A is expressed on osteoclasts and triggers a cascade of signaling events on binding with TNFSF11, leading to osteoclast differentiation [Figure 2]. The binding of TNFSF11-TNFRSF11A promotes the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts, extends their survival, and activates bone resorption through various signaling pathways. [46] The binding of TNFSF11 causes conformational changes in the intracellular domain of the TNFRSF11A. This leads to the recruitment of various adaptor proteins, including members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) family, such as TRAF2 and TRAF6.[70] This recruitment initiates the activation of several intracellular signaling cascades, including the NF-kB, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), and PI3K/Akt signaling cascades.[71] Activation of the NF-kB cascade involves the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of the NF-kB inhibitor, resulting in the release and nuclear translocation of NF-kB dimers. These dimers bind to the promoters of target genes, such as those encoding nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and c-Fos.[72] All of which are critical regulators of osteoclast differentiation.[72] NFATc1, in particular, functions as a master transcription factor in osteoclastogenesis. On activation, it translocates to the nucleus. It induces the expression of key osteoclast-specific genes, including TRAP, cathepsin K, and matrix metalloproteinase 9, which are essential for osteoclast differentiation and bone resorptive activity.[73] Interaction of TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A also activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 pathways of the MAPK signaling cascade. ERK, JNK, and p38 pathways upregulate transcription factors and proteins needed for osteoclast formation and fine-tuning of osteoclast differentiation and function, thus promoting osteoclast survival and enhancing bone resorption activity.[74] Moreover, activation of TNFRSF11A also stimulates the PI3K/Akt cascade, which, in turn, upregulates the expression of anti-apoptotic and survival genes, thereby promoting and enhancing osteoclast survival and function [Figure 3].[75]

- Osteoclastogenesis is initiated by tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11)/RANKL signaling from osteoblasts to osteoclast precursors. The schematic illustrates the key cellular interaction that triggers osteoclast formation. Osteoblasts secrete the cytokine TNFSF11 (also known as RANKL). This ligand binds to its specific receptor, TNFRSF11A (also known as RANK), on the surface of osteoclast precursors. This TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A interaction is the primary signal required for the differentiation and fusion of these precursors into mature, multinucleated osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone resorption.

- Intracellular signaling pathways activated by tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11)/TNFRSF11A binding during osteoclast differentiation and survival. On binding of TNFSF11 (RANKL) to its receptor TNFRSF11A (RANK), the adapter protein tumor necrosis factor receptor-receptor-associated factors (TRAF6) is recruited to the intracellular domain. This recruitment initiates two major signaling cascades: The nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) cascade: Critical for initiating the genetic program of osteoclast differentiation. This leads to the dimerization of NF-kB and its translocation to the nucleus, where it promotes the transcription of key osteoclastogenic genes (e.g., nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1, TRAF6). The PI3K/Akt Cascade: This pathway, also involving TRAF6, activates Akt. Akt subsequently activates the mTOR pathway, which promotes cell survival, growth, and metabolic changes necessary for the developing osteoclast.
Furthermore, the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A interaction induces changes in intracellular calcium (Ca++) levels. This, in turn, induces the Ca++/Calmodulin pathway and, thus, regulates various osteoclastic activities, including bone resorption.[76] In addition, mature osteoclasts secrete hydrochloric acid (HCl) and lysosomal enzymes (e.g., cathepsin K) that degrade the mineralized bone matrix, allowing for bone resorption.[77]
CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A PATHWAY
The TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A signaling pathway regulates osteoclastic activity and is crucial for bone remodeling. Dysregulation can result in pathological conditions such as osteoporosis and osteopetrosis.
Osteoporosis and over-activation of the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A pathway
In osteoporosis, the overactivation of the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A pathway causes excessive osteoclast activity, resulting in increased bone resorption. Factors such as hormonal changes and inflammation can elevate the expression of TNFSF11, disrupting the delicate equilibrium between bone resorption and formation. This imbalance contributes to bone loss and a decrease in bone mineral density, thereby increasing the susceptibility to fractures. Therapeutic targeting of this pathway, such as with denosumab – a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to TNFSF11 – can effectively treat osteoporosis by inhibiting the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A interaction, thereby reducing osteoclast activity and bone resorption.[78] Denosumab, along with other TNFSF11 inhibitors, has been developed to treat diseases with excessive bone resorption. Denosumab prevents the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A interaction, reducing osteoclast formation and activity. It has been approved for osteoporosis treatment to decrease fracture risk in patients with low bone density.[79]
Osteopetrosis and impaired TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A pathway
Variations in TNFSF11 or TNFRSF11A can impair osteoclast differentiation and activity, leading to insufficient bone resorption and excessive bone tissue accumulation, which can cause osteopetrosis.[80]
CHALLENGES, RESEARCH GAPS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Osteopetrosis presents several challenges in research and clinical management. One of the key gaps is the limited understanding of genetic modifiers-other genetic factors that can influence the severity and progression of the disease. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to predict disease outcomes and tailor interventions effectively. In addition, incomplete penetrance in some cases of osteopetrosis complicates diagnosis and prognosis, as individuals with the same variant may experience varying degrees of disease severity or none at all. The genetic heterogeneity of osteopetrosis further complicates the development of targeted therapies, as variants in different genes can cause distinct forms of the disease, each requiring specific treatment approaches. These challenges underscore the need for more research to understand genetic factors better, improve diagnostic methods, and develop personalized treatment strategies for affected individuals.
Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing have introduced promising therapeutic strategies for osteopetrosis by enabling the correction of pathogenic variants at the genomic level. This technology facilitates precise and targeted gene modification, representing a significant improvement over conventional treatment modalities. Moreover, the application of induced pluripotent stem cells has emerged as a powerful platform for investigating osteopetrosis at the cellular level, providing a robust model to study disease pathophysiology and elucidate its underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, expanding research into epigenetics and microRNAs is revealing how gene expression regulation may contribute to the pathogenesis of osteopetrosis, providing new therapeutic targets. With these advancements, there is growing potential for personalized medicine, which could tailor treatment strategies to individual genetic profiles, optimizing outcomes and minimizing adverse effects for patients with this rare disorder.
DISCUSSION
Osteopetrosis, a genetic disorder marked by defective osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, is caused by variants in genes critical for osteoclast differentiation, acidification, and vesicular transport. The autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (OPTA) and recessive (OPTB) forms exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity, reflecting the functional diversity of mutated genes. In OPTA, heterozygous missense variants in CLCN7, LRP5, or PLEKHM1 impair chloride transport or Wnt signaling, leading to mild osteosclerosis. In contrast, biallelic frameshift, splice site non-sense variants in OPTB-associated genes (TCIRG1, OSTM1, and SNX10) disrupt osteoclastogenesis or lysosomal acidification, resulting in severe skeletal dysplasia, hematopoietic failure, and neuropathies.
Central to osteoclast dysfunction is the TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A pathway, which governs osteoclast differentiation through NF-kB, MAPK, and calcium signaling.[80] Loss-of-function variants in TNFSF11 or TNFRSF11A abrogate osteoclast formation, causing OPTB type 2 and OPTB type 7, while excessive TNFSF11 activity drives osteoporosis.[81] This duality emphasizes the pathway’s therapeutic relevance: Denosumab, a TNFSF11 inhibitor, mitigates osteoporosis, whereas recombinant TNFSF11 or gene therapy could theoretically rescue osteopetrosis phenotypes.[82,83]
The acidification machinery, involving TCIRG1 (V-ATPase subunit), CLCN7 (Cl-/H+ antiporter), and CA2 (carbonic anhydrase), is indispensable for bone resorption.[46] Variants in these genes disrupt the acidic microenvironment required for mineral dissolution, leading to osteoclast-rich (e.g., TCIRG1) or osteoclast-poor (e.g., TNFSF11) osteopetrosis. Similarly, SLC4A2 and SNX10 defects impair ion exchange and vesicular trafficking, highlighting the complexity of osteoclast polarization and ruffled border formation.[63,84]
Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic regulators and non-coding RNAs play a role in osteoclast differentiation. For instance, ITGB3 and OS9 modulate integrin signaling and ER stress responses, indirectly affecting osteoclast function.[64] These findings expand the genetic landscape of osteopetrosis and suggest novel therapeutic targets. However, mechanistic insights remain sparse, necessitating functional studies to elucidate their roles in bone homeostasis.
CONCLUSION
Osteopetrosis exemplifies the intricate interplay between genetic defects and bone remodeling. Variants in osteoclast-specific genes disrupt resorption, leading to pathognomonic osteosclerosis and systemic complications. The TNFSF11/TNFRSF11A axis emerges as a pivotal regulator, with therapeutic potential for both osteopetrosis and osteoporosis. While current management relies on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe OPTB, advancements in gene editing (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9) and small-molecule chaperones targeting misfolded proteins (e.g., CLCN7) offer promise.
High-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is helping in differential diagnosis. Syndromic forms of osteopetrosis have received a molecular classification based on NGS data outcomes. Moreover, novel genomic variants have been identified as an underlying cause in unresolved cases. However, the causative variants in some cases are still unknown, indicating that the genetics of osteopetrosis deserve further research.
Although whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing have greatly advanced our understanding of the genetics of osteopetrosis, unresolved cases highlight the need for additional approaches. Long-read sequencing technologies (e.g., PacBio, Oxford Nanopore) may capture complex structural variants, repetitive elements, or deep intronic changes that are often missed by the conventional NGS approach. Likewise, systematic evaluation of copy number variations through array-based methods should be considered to identify large pathogenic deletions or duplications. The integration of reverse-detection strategies, such as RNA sequencing, provides additional opportunities to identify aberrant splicing, expression outliers, or allele-specific transcription, which can aid in resolving variants of uncertain significance. Beyond genetic alterations, epigenetic regulation likely contributes to the variable penetrance and expressivity observed in patients carrying the same variant. To address this, chromatin profiling in patient-derived fibroblasts or osteoclasts, using approaches such as ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and DNA methylation profiling, may help clarify the epigenetic mechanisms underlying disease variability. Together, these complementary approaches hold promise for enhancing diagnostic yield and deepening the mechanistic understanding of osteopetrosis.
Authors’ contributions:
SB: Conceptualization, methodology, writing – original draft: developed the research concept, designed the methodology, and drafted the initial manuscript. KIK: Original idea, writing, reviewed and edited the manuscript, validated the findings, and provided oversight and leadership throughout the project. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the manuscript’s content and similarity index.
Ethical approval:
The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Defects in TCIRG1 subunit of the vacuolar proton pump are responsible for a subset of human autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Nat Genet. 2000;25:343-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteoclasts: What do they do and how do they do it? Am J Pathol. 2007;170:427-35.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phenotype-autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Bone. 2022;165:116577.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Origin of osteoclasts: Mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenvironment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:7260-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glycobiology in osteoclast differentiation and function. Bone Res. 2023;11:55.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor gene. Nature. 1990;345:442-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteoinduction capability of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in intramuscular and subcutaneous sites: An experimental study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:112-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2412-24.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Developmental origin, functional maintenance and genetic rescue of osteoclasts. Nature. 2019;568:541-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med. 2011;17:1231-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nat Med. 2011;17:1235-41.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bone imaging: Osteoclast and osteoblast dynamics. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1763:1-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intrafamilial phenotypic variability of osteopetrosis due to chloride channel 7 (CLCN7) mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;133A:216-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Six novel missense mutations in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) Gene in different conditions with an increased bone density. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:763-71.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albers-schönberg disease (autosomal dominant osteopetrosis, type II) results from mutations in the ClCN7 chloride channel gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:2861-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A new heterozygous mutation (R714C) of the osteopetrosis gene, pleckstrin homolog domain containing family M (with run domain) member 1 (PLEKHM1), impairs vesicular acidification and increases TRACP secretion in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:380-91.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Localization of the gene causing autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type I to chromosome 11q12-13. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1111-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Identification of the first deletion in the LRP5 gene in a patient with autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type I. Bone. 2011;49:568-71.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Natural history of type II autosomal dominant osteopetrosis: A single center retrospective study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:819641.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis: Clinical severity and natural history of 94 subjects with a chloride channel 7 gene mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:771-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Characterization of a relatively malignant form of osteopetrosis caused by a novel mutation in the PLEKHM1 Gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1979-87.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteopetrosis: Genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:522-36.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteoclast-poor human osteopetrosis due to mutations in the gene encoding RANKL. Nat Genet. 2007;39:960-2.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A phenocopy of CAII deficiency: A novel genetic explanation for inherited infantile osteopetrosis with distal renal tubular acidosis. J Med Genet. 2003;40:115-121.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001;104:205-15.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grey-lethal mutation induces severe malignant autosomal recessive osteopetrosis in mouse and human. Nat Med. 2003;9:399-406.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Involvement of PLEKHM1 in osteoclastic vesicular transport and osteopetrosis in incisors absent rats and humans. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:919-30.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Human osteoclast-poor osteopetrosis with hypogammaglobulinemia due to TNFRSF11A (RANK) mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:64-76.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- An SNX10 mutation causes malignant osteopetrosis of infancy. J Med Genet. 2012;49:221-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SLC4A2 deficiency causes a new type of osteopetrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37:226-35.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novel c.G630A TCIRG1 mutation causes aberrant splicing resulting in an unusually mild form of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:17180-93.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and molecular characterization of five Chinese patients with autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021;9:e1815.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A mild autosomal recessive form of osteopetrosis. Am J Med Genet. 1984;17:451-64.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A rare case of osteoclast-poor osteopetrosis (RANKL mutation) with recurrent osteomyelitis of mandible: A case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13:717-21.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phenotypic characteristics of bone in carbonic anhydrase II-deficient mice. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008;82:66-76.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Two novel CAII mutations causing carbonic anhydrase II deficiency syndrome in two unrelated Chinese families. Metab Brain Dis. 2015;30:989-97.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The correlation of intracranial parenchymal calcium score and the severity of neurological clinical presentation in carbonic anhydrase deficiency type 2. Brain Dev. 2025;47:104309.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A novel homozygous nonsense mutation in the CA2 gene (c.368G>A. p.W123X) linked to carbonic anhydrase II deficiency syndrome in a Chinese family. Metab Brain Dis. 2021;36:589-99.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molecular mechanisms of craniofacial and dental abnormalities in osteopetrosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10412.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A unique mutation underlying carbonic anhydrase II deficiency syndrome in patients of Arab descent. Hum Genet. 1994;94:581-2.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) deficiency in Maghrebian patients: Evidence for founder effect and genomic recombination at the CA II locus. Hum Genet. 1997;99:634-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marble bone disease: A review of osteopetrosis and its oral health implications for dentists. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:839-43.
- [Google Scholar]
- Chloride channel 7 (CLCN7) gene mutations in intermediate autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Hum Genet. 2003;112:186-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chloride channel ClCN7 mutations are responsible for severe recessive, dominant, and intermediate osteopetrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1740-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severe malignant osteopetrosis caused by a GL gene mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1194-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lethal osteopetrosis with multiple fractures in utero. Am J Med Genet. 1986;23:811-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Infantile osteopetrosis, craniosynostosis, and Chiari malformation type I with novel OSTEM1 mutation. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2013;8:34-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OSTM1 pleiotropic roles from osteopetrosis to neurodegeneration. Bone. 2022;163:116505.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Identification of a novel mutation in the coding region of the grey-lethal gene OSTM1 in human malignant infantile osteopetrosis. Hum Mutat. 2004;23:471-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mutations in OSTM1 (grey lethal) define a particularly severe form of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis with neural involvement. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1098-105.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and cellular manifestations of OSTM1-related infantile osteopetrosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:296-300.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Challenges in long-term control of hypercalcaemia with denosumab after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for TNFRSF11A osteoclast-poor autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Bone Rep. 2020;14:100738.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homozygous stop mutation in the SNX10 gene in a consanguineous Iraqi boy with osteopetrosis and corpus callosum hypoplasia. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56:32-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genome sequencing identifies a large non-coding region deletion of SNX10 causing autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. J Hum Genet. 2023;68:287-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snx10: A newly identified locus associated with human osteopetrosis. IBMS Bonekey. 2013;2013:421.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SNX10 regulates osteoclastogenic cell fusion and osteoclast size in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2024;39:1503-17.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteopetrosis associated with PLEKHM1 and SNX10 genes, both involved in osteoclast vesicular trafficking. Bone. 2022;164:116520.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostm1 bifunctional roles in osteoclast maturation: Insights from a mouse model mimicking a human OSTM1 mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33:888-98.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SLC4A2, another gene involved in acid-base balancing machinery of osteoclasts, causes osteopetrosis. Bone. 2023;167:116603.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serum CTX levels and histomorphometric analysis in Src versus RANKL knockout mice. J Bone Miner Metab. 2018;36:264-73.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The role of TNF-receptor family members and other TRAF-dependent receptors in bone resorption. Arthritis Res. 2001;3:6-12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epidermal growth factor receptor regulates osteoclast differentiation and survival through cross-talking with RANK signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2008;217:409-22.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fosl1 is a transcriptional target of c-Fos during osteoclast differentiation. Nat Genet. 2000;24:184-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The many ways of osteoclast activation. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:2530-2.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inhibition effects of a natural inhibitor on RANKL downstream cellular signalling cascades cross-talking. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:4236-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regulation of osteoblast migration involving receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) signaling. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:2951-60.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osteoclastogenesis: The role of calcium and calmodulin. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2005;15:1-13. Erratum in: Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2005;15
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lysosomal pH plays a key role in regulation of mTOR activity in osteoclasts. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:413-25.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, inhibits bone resorption and increases BMD in knock-in mice that express chimeric (murine/human) RANKL. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:182-95.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:756-65.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genetic disorders associated with the RANKL/OPG/RANK pathway. J Bone Miner Metab. 2021;39:45-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Disease status in autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2 is determined by osteoclastic properties. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1089-97.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RANKL inhibition improves muscle strength and insulin sensitivity and restores bone mass. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:3329. [Published correction appears in J Clin Invest 2023;133:e169317]
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Direct cell-cell contact between mature osteoblasts and osteoclasts dynamically controls their functions in vivo. Nat Commun. 2018;9:300.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SLC4A2-mediated Cl-/HCO3-exchange activity is essential for calpain-dependent regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in osteoclasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2163-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
