Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Activity Report
Author’s Reply
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editor Profile
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Original Article
Protocol
Radiology Quiz
Review Article
Surgical Technique
Systematic Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Technical Notes
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
2017:1:2;23-24
doi: 10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_30_17

Next-Generation sequencing and molecular diagnosis in musculoskeletal disorders

Sulman Basit
 Center for Genetics and Inherited Diseases, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawarah, Saudi Arabia

Corresponding Author:
Sulman Basit
Center for Genetics and Inherited Diseases, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawarah
Saudi Arabia
sbasit.phd@gmail.com
How to cite this article:
Basit S. Next-Generation sequencing and molecular diagnosis in musculoskeletal disorders. J Musculoskelet Surg Res 2017;1:23-24
Copyright: (C)2017 Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research

Muscles and bones are two different and diverse tissues. However, they share surprising similarities being originated from a common mesoderm. During early development and musculoskeletal system regeneration, both muscles and bones come together and function as a unit. Studies of mesoderm-mesenchymal interactions and developmental pathways have revealed some common links between muscles and bones. For instance, connexins and pannexins are crucial for the development and maintenance of both muscles and bones.[1],[2] In skeletal muscles, connexins, and pannexins play important roles during development and regeneration through synchronized regulation of metabolic functions through cell-to-cell communication. In bone, the presence of connexin and more recently of pannexin channels in osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes has been described and shown to be essential for normal skeletal development and bone adaptation.[2],[3] This highlights the important role of common players in the development, maintenance, and regeneration of musculoskeletal tissue.

In this issue of the journal, Alkhiary et al.[4] have reported a heterozygous variant in a Saudi family segregating a musculoskeletal disorder specifically osteogenesis imperfect (OI) Type 4. They used state-of-the-art technique of whole exome sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of this clinically overlapping phenotype to clearly specify the subclinical of this rare disease/condition. Authors show that the missense variant is indeed damaging which disrupt the normal collagen protein structure. Although the variant identified is recurrent; however, it is the first report in Saudi Arabian population. Rapid development and advancement of next-generation genomic technologies have contributed to the understanding of diseases. Genome-wide SNP genotyping, transcriptome analysis, whole exome, and whole genome sequencing have assisted in the identification of the genetic factors of monogenic and complex disorders including musculoskeletal disorders. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has made possible to associate the phenotype, the very core of clinical medicine, to changes in the genetic material. NGS is capable of sequencing complete human genome, however, limitations of our current understanding of the function of noncoding part of the genome made its deployment difficult in a diagnostic setup. Therefore, exome sequencing, sequencing of the coding part of genome, has quickly penetrated clinical medicine and established its utility in a wide range of applications that cover the entire spectrum of diseases from the extremely rare to the very common.

Musculoskeletal disorders are conditions that affect muscles, bones, and joints. Musculoskeletal disorders are multifactorial, and apart from genetic factors, environmental causes also contribute to disease pathogenesis. Therefore, detection of susceptibility genes and underlying genetic variants may provide clues to their etiology and pathogenesis. Extensive genetic studies are demanded to gain better insight into advanced diagnosis and treatment for these disorders. OI, osteoarthritis (OA) of hip and knee joints, degenerative disc disease, clubfoot and developmental dysplasia of the hip are common musculoskeletal disorders. The genes responsible for Mendelian inherited musculoskeletal conditions are known which, when mutated, lead to a variety of skeletal dysplasias including OI. Several genetic studies including genome-wide association studies and whole exome sequencing have revealed several interesting predisposing candidate genes, linkage intervals, pathogenic variants, and microRNAs for these disorders.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] For other more common musculoskeletal conditions (such as scoliosis and OA) with complex inheritance pattern, the etiology and pathogenesis have not been revealed. Only a few genes have so far been associated with the above-mentioned disorders at genome-wide significance levels. Hence, we have to discover additional susceptibility alleles for these disorders.

Most of the genes implicated in monogenic and complex forms of musculoskeletal disorders play roles in common signaling pathways crucial for mesenchymal cell differentiation, bone mineral density, muscle differentiation, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in chondrocytes, skeletal muscle development, and bone remodeling and metabolism. Some of the newly identified genes need functional studies to reveal their role in musculoskeletal biology and bone morphogenesis. The insight provided by genetic studies is aiding in the identification of biomarkers predictive of disease, redefining disease, response to treatment, and a possibility to discovery novel drug targets for musculoskeletal disorders.

Although the current advancement in molecular diagnostic tools has revolutionized our knowledge of underlying genetic causes of musculoskeletal disorders, however, we are still far behind to offer treatment in most of the cases. Clinicians who are up to date with recent genetic progress can deliver better services to the community by offering better counseling, diagnostic tests, and treatment options for the patients. It is the need of the hour that clinicians or orthopedic surgeons should pay attention to understand genomics role in their clinics. The number of available genetic tests for musculoskeletal conditions are increasing as more disease-specific genes are identified. Access to up-to-date genetic resources such as the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM; https://www.omim.org/) and GeneTests (an online list of disorders for which genetic testing is available; https://www.genetests.org/) is critical.

The orthopedic surgeon can assist in identifying patients with inherited musculoskeletal disorders and refer them, if appropriate, to a clinical geneticist. It is critical that genetic counseling is available to help future generations make informed decisions regarding musculoskeletal disorders. To conclude, by incorporating genetic knowledge and understanding in diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, clinicians can help increase overall diagnostic efficacy and offer improved medical care.

References
1.
Langlois S, Cowan KN. Regulation of skeletal muscle myoblast differentiation and proliferation by pannexins. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;925:57-73.
[Google Scholar]
2.
Plotkin LI, Davis HM, Cisterna BA, Sáez JC. Connexins and pannexins in bone and skeletal muscle. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2017;15:326-34.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Plotkin LI, Laird DW, Amedee J. Role of connexins and pannexins during ontogeny, regeneration, and pathologies of bone. BMC Cell Biol 2016;17 Suppl 1:19.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Alkhiary YM, Ramzan A, Ilyas M, Khan U, Nasir A, Khan MI, et al. Whole exome sequencing analysis identifies a missense variant in COL1A2 gene which causes osteogenesis imperfecta type IV in a family from Saudi Arabia. J Musculoskelet Surg Res 2017;1:33-8.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Basit S, Alharby E, Albalawi AM, Khoshhal KI. Whole genome SNP genotyping in a family segregating developmental dysplasia of the hip detected runs of homozygosity on chromosomes 15q13.3 and 19p13.2. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2017. doi: 10.1111/cga.12235.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Zhao L, Zhou Z, Wang S, Jiao Q, Wu J, Ma F, et al. A recurrent mutation in bone morphogenetic proteins-2-inducible kinase gene is associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Exp Ther Med 2017;13:1773-8.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Basit S, Albalawi AM, Alharby E, Khoshhal KI. Exome sequencing identified rare variants in genes HSPG2 and ATP2B4 in a family segregating developmental dysplasia of the hip. BMC Med Genet 2017;18:34.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Basit S, Khoshhal KI. Genetics of clubfoot; recent progress and future perspectives. Eur J Med Genet 2017. pii: S1769-7212(17)30255-0.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Zhytnik L, Maasalu K, Reimann E, Prans E, Kõks S, Märtson A, et al. Mutational analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes among Estonian osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Hum Genomics 2017;11:19.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Umair M, Alhaddad B, Rafique A, Jan A, Haack TB, Graf E, et al. Exome sequencing reveals a novel homozygous splice site variant in the WNT1 gene underlying osteogenesis imperfecta type 3. Pediatr Res 2017;82:753-8.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Ni M, Ding H, Liu S, Zhu P, Wu Q, Li W, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis in a large family with osteogenesis imperfecta type I. Mol Med Rep 2017;16:6846-9.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Hackinger S, Trajanoska K, Styrkarsdottir U, Zengini E, Steinberg J, Ritchie GR, et al. Evaluation of shared genetic aetiology between osteoarthritis and bone mineral density identifies SMAD3 as a novel osteoarthritis risk locus. Hum Mol Genet 2017;26:3850-8.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Li H, Bai B, Wang J, Xu Z, Yan S, Liu G, et al. Identification of key mRNAs and microRNAs in the pathogenesis and progression of osteoarthritis using microarray analysis. Mol Med Rep 2017;16:5659-66.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Gari MA, AlKaff M, Alsehli HS, Dallol A, Gari A, Abu-Elmagd M, et al. Identification of novel genetic variations affecting osteoarthritis patients. BMC Med Genet 2016;17:68.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Zhang Z, Kong Z, Zhu M, Lu W, Ni L, Bai Y, et al. Whole genome sequencing identifies ANXA3 and MTHFR mutations in a large family with an unknown equinus deformity associated genetic disorder. Mol Biol Rep 2016;43:1147-55.
[Google Scholar]
16.
Yang H, Zheng Z, Cai H, Li H, Ye X, Zhang X, et al. Three novel missense mutations in the filamin B gene are associated with isolated congenital talipes equinovarus. Hum Genet 2016;135:1181-9.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,573

PDF downloads
369
Show Sections